Hallie Golden reports from the self-proclaimed Capitol Hill Organized Protest (Chop) zone in Seattle:
A Fox News reporter has been accused ofpushing a protester on Monday morning at the occupied area in Seattle known as the Capitol Hill Organized Protest (Chop).
Steve Patterson
(@PattersonNBC)#BREAKING: Protestors inside #CHOP surround a vehicle protected by private security just outside the zone.
They say the man inside is a reporter and shoved a protestor along with verbal abuse.
They won’t let the car go. The security is armed. Protestors are armed.@NBCNews pic.twitter.com/tvbuYnqzlu
Derrick Drungo, an activist at CHOPwho witnessed the incident, told The Guardianthe reporter then got in his truck and protesters surrounded it, asking for an apology.Activists said the reporter’s personal securitydetailcame out and tried to pepper spray them, and the group moved a concrete barrier in front of the truck to stop him from leaving.
Steve Patterson
(@PattersonNBC)#DEVELOPING: So the man that was in that car got out and started walking away from #CHOP.
Protestors followed, swarming. Again, they say he’s an #FNC reporter and that he shoved a female protestor.
He said nothing in response. They walked several city blocks. @NBCNews pic.twitter.com/6QQBy7mjxY
The reporter later got out of the car and another man with Fox tried to move the truck. While driving very slowly, the man hit Drungo.
enjoli liston
(@enjoli_)Hallie Golden @HallieGolden4 reports from CHOP in Seattle on an incident involving a Fox reporter and an activist today pic.twitter.com/iwqkGRKt6m
“I got back in front of the car and the driver kept driving,” Drungo told the Guardian.
“My hands were up in the air, and he hit me six times. I told him to stop,” He added.
At a press briefing just now, reporters fired off questions to White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany about reports that Trump had knowledge that Russia offered bounties to Taliban militants to fatally attack Western coalition troops, including some from the US.
Top administration officials, including members of Trump’s national security council, have been discussing the Russian bounty offer for months, the New York Times first reported.
McEnany doubled down on the Trump’s defense that he nor vice president Mike Pence were briefed on the Russian bounties and there is “no consensus” from the intelligence community that the news is true. Members of Congress are reportedly being briefed on the news this afternoon.
McEnany declined to answer specific questions on why Trump and Pence were not briefed on the bounties before.
Kaitlan Collins
(@kaitlancollins)The White House doesn’t explain why Trump wasn’t briefed on the intel about Russian bounties to kill U.S. troops if it even had a hint of credibility — only saying it wasn’t “verified” & there’s not a consensus in the intel community. Won’t say who dissents.
The press secretary turned questions about the bounties into an opportunity to bash the New York Times and the Washington Post, who also reported on the bounties. McEnany repeated claims that the reports are “unverified” and part of the “failed Russia reporting of the New York Times”.
David Nakamura
(@DavidNakamura). @PressSec so much more animated in attacking the NYT than offering any criticism of Russia over the reports based on US intelligence sources that Moscow paid Afghan militants to kill American soldiers.
A vigil held in the memory of Elijah McClain, a 23-year-old who black man who was killed by police in Aurora, Colorado, turned violent when police pepper began to pepper spray the crowd, saying that those at the vigil were unlawfully gathering in front of a police station.
Here’s a look at the scene:
Riot police confront peaceful violin vigil for Elijah McClain with pepper spray – video
Jacksonville, Florida, the city that is slated to host the Republican National Convention in August, announced that it will adopt a mandatory mask requirement for all indoor locations where social distancing is not possible.
That makes things a bit awkward since the Republican National Committee actually moved its convention to Jacksonville after the state it was supposed to be held in, North Carolina, said it would likely impose some restrictions to shrink the size of the convention. North Carolina governor Roy Cooper said he could not agree to guarantees Donald Trump and the Republican National Committee were seeking that would allow the convention to be the big, people-packed convention it was planned to be.
City of Jacksonville (COJ)
(@CityofJax)At 5 p.m. today, the City of Jacksonville will be adopting a mandatory mask requirement for public & indoor locations, and in other situations where individuals cannot socially distance.
Please continue to practice personal responsibility to help stop the spread of this virus. pic.twitter.com/dcAuolVMyZ
While it’s unclear how Trump and the Republican National Committee will respond to this, Trump and some fellow conservatives have made it clear that they do not like mandatory mask requirements.
Florida has seen a skyrocketing of new Covid-19 cases, surpassing 9,000 new cases in one day over the weekend. State and local leaders have had to roll back reopening measures because of the influx of new cases.
Updated
At a press conference today, New York governor Andrew Cuomo said that New York City might have to delay going into its third phase of reopening, the start of reopening indoor dining at restaurant, because of reports that people are not following social distancing guidelines and visitors from states that have high infection rates may be coming into New York.
Jenna Amatulli
(@ohheyjenna)NYC is supposed to enter phase 3 on July 6, but Cuomo is expressing concern because people aren’t adhering to CDC guidelines and people from other states — with spiking cases — have been coming back pic.twitter.com/FiyGuoLMdU
Cuomo said that most people – probably 95%, he said – have been wearing masks, but the state has to worry about the other 5% and how local law enforcement can step in if necessary.
Oh, and Cuomo also built a “mountain” to physically show how the number of cases in New York peaked and then went down… because why not?
Zach Williams
(@ZachReports)Gov Andrew Cuomo built his COVID mountain pic.twitter.com/F7RtZYUhxH
As Seattle officials expect to start dismantling the occupied protest zone in Seattle, more violence has been reported from the area last night. Here’s more from Hallie Golden, who’s reporting from Seattle:
Seattle police are investigating a shooting that left one man dead and another in critical condition early Monday morning in the area known as the Capitol Hill Organized Protest (Chop) in Seattle.
A spokesperson for Harborview Medical Center said that one victim arrived at the hospital by private vehicle at about 3:15 a.m., while the second was transported by medics and arrived at about 3:30 a.m.
Four other people have been shot in the area of the self-proclaimed police-free zone, which was founded about three weeks ago after a series of dangerous clashes between protesters and law enforcement culminated in police abandoning their precinct building in the area. Several people have been injured and a 19-year-old man was killed during these shootings.
On Friday, Mayor Jenny Durkan held an impromptu meeting with protesters in which she told them the city would remove the concrete barriers surrounding the protest zone, according to Converge Media, the only news organization allowed in. The barriers were expected to be removed Sunday, but now may be taken away Monday.
Many cities around the US are still seeing major protests against racism and police brutality. Seattle has seen one of the longest, most intense protests as protestors have barricaded themselves into a portion of the city, virtually creating an occupied zone. Today, Seattle officials said they will work on disassemble the protest area.
Here’s more from Hallie Golden, who’s reporting from Seattle:
Seattle officials are expected to clear concrete barriers surrounding the occupied area known as the Capitol Hill Organized Protest (Chop) on Monday, in what would be the city’s first major step to begin to dismantle the protest zone.
A large group of Seattle Department of Transportation crews tried to remove the barriers early Friday morning, but were stopped by several people sitting or lying on the ground in front of the equipment.
During an impromptu meeting with protesters later in the day on Friday, Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan said that the city would clear the barricades Sunday, but would leave those directly outside the police’s east precinct, according to Converge Media, the only news organization allowed in the meeting. No crews arrived Sunday to remove the barricades.
The protest zone was founded about three weeks ago after police abandoned the precinct, following dangerous clashes between protesters and law enforcement. CHOP was initially home to hundreds of protesters, but in recent days those numbers have dwindled dramatically, likely in response to several shootings in the area.
Early on Monday morning, officials reported another shooting, which left one man dead and another in critical condition.
Although some people have moved their tents in recent days from Cal Anderson Park to the area surrounding the precinct, many others remain at the park. Questions remain about how protesters will respond to the city attempting to remove barricades, and what will happen to those still in the park.

A barricade in Seattle’s the occupied protest zone. Photograph: Amy Katz/ZUMA Wire/REX/Shutterstock
Updated
The Supreme Court today also announced that it decided not to take on a case regarding federal executions.
The case puts an end to a lengthy battle that began when US attorney general William Barr directed the Bureau of Prisons to schedule federal executions for four inmates convicted of killing children, resuming federal executions for the first time since 2003.
Some of the inmates challenged the new procedures the Department of Justice was taking to get federal executions off the ground again, arguing that the government was circumventing proper methods in order to ensure inmates would be executed quickly.
For many years before his presidency, Donald Trump has been an advocate for the death penalty, infamously taking out a full-page ad in a New York newspaper saying that the Central Park Five, all who have been exonerated, should get the death penalty.
The supreme court’s third and last decision released today dealt a win to conservatives fighting against the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB), a consumer-finance watchdog agency within the government created to protect consumers from abuse from banks and other financial institutions in the wake of the 2008 recession.
In its decision, the supreme court gave power to the president to fire whoever heads the bureau. The law that created the CFPB said that the Senate would confirm a director who would serve a five-year appointment and could only be fired for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office”.
Trump, along with a firm that was being investigated by the CFPB for misleading financial practices, sued the government saying that the law too severely restricted the president’s power. The court today agreed with them, ruling 5-4 that the president has the right to remove the CFBP’s director “at will”.
SCOTUSblog
(@SCOTUSblog)Here is the bottom line from Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion in CFPB case: pic.twitter.com/GmE3TGd5hc
Updated
People are noting that supreme court justice Brett Kavanaugh voted to uphold the restrictive abortions law, despite what Maine senator Susan Collins said about the judge when speaking about her decision to vote for his confirmation.
Ronald Brownstein
(@RonBrownstein)But Kavanaugh, despite assurances from @SenatorCollins that he views abortion rights as “settled law,” votes to severely restrict abortion access in LA. https://t.co/8lYm3ntV5H
Collins said in 2018 that Kavanaugh has said before and told her personally many times that he respects Roe v Wade, the supreme court case that made abortion in the US a legal right, as precedent. “I have always been concerned about preserving Roe v Wade,” she said at the time.
And then there is, of course, this wonderful fun fact about today’s ruling.
Jaime Santos
(@Jaime_ASantos)In a case about abortion, every single male Justice on the Court felt the need to file an opinion expressing his own views, and we do not hear a single woman Justice’s voice on the topic.
Updated
While chief justice John Roberts ruled with the liberal judges this morning and struck down a restrictive abortion law, Roberts made it clear in his opinion for the court that his decision is based on his respecting a previous supreme court decision.
In 2016, the supreme court struck down a Texas law that was nearly identical to the Louisiana law the supreme court decided on today. When deciding that case, Whole Woman’s Health v Hellerstedt, Roberts actually voted against the majority, saying that the law was constitutional.
Jessica Glenza
(@JessicaGlenza)Roberts argued Whole Woman’s Health, the precedent-setting case which made admitting privileges unconstitutional, was wrongly decided. But he argued that is irrelevant here:
“The legal doctrine of stare decisis requires us… to treat like cases alike.” https://t.co/iz4DvaHkcH
Updated
Reproductive rights advocacy groups are celebrating the supreme court’s decision that a Louisiana law that restricted abortion access is unconstitutional.
Guttmacher Institute
(@Guttmacher)BREAKING: SCOTUS just struck down Louisiana’s admitting privileges law—a critical win in reaffirming the right to abortion access! We’re relieved that people in Louisiana can still get care & celebrate this victory in the ongoing fight to ensure abortion rights for all.
National Women’s Law Center
(@nwlc)BREAKING: #SCOTUS rules that abortion clinics in Louisiana stay open and upholds its decision from four years ago in Whole Women’s Health – today we can rest easy knowing abortion access is still intact 🎉🎉🎉#MyRightMyDecision pic.twitter.com/EaDny9uu1I
PRH
(@prhdocs)BREAKING: SCOTUS strikes down admitting privileges for providers of abortion care! This is great news and affirms what we know to be true… medically unnecessary restrictions on abortion care are unlawful and dangerous. #MyRightMyDecision
Updated
Supreme court strikes down abortion restriction in major victory for campaigners
The US Supreme Court just struck down a major abortion case. The court ruled that a Louisiana law that requires doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, severely limiting access to abortion, is unconstitutional.
The court ruled the decision 5-4, with chief justice John Roberts siding with the court’s liberal justices to strike the law down.
Read more about the case and the court decision’s here:
Updated